8
15-16 Why
to talk of far past, even in the initial period of government of these English
people, the characters of the Muslims were so high that they received
appreciation from their opponents and the enemies of their religion. These
Muslims never told a lie even for the sake of their personal and individual
benefits. In addition, even those matters in which there was the risk of loss
of the whole nation and all people, they used to follow the course of truth and
adhered to the following self-explaining verse of the Holy Quran for their
action: O
you who believe! Be you staunch in justice, witness for Allah, even though it
be against yourselves or (your) parents or (your) kindred (4:135)
Allah
Almighty says: and let
not hatred of any people deduce you that you deal not justly. Deal justly, that
is nearer to your duty (5:8)
It
is an incident of the early period of British Reign that a disputed arose
between the Hindus and Muslims somewhere in the town of Kaandhla in the
District of Muzaffar Garh regarding the ownership of a place of worship as the
former claimed it an idol-temple and the later a Masjid. The English Magistrate
recorded the declarations made from both ends and asked the Muslims that if
amongst the Hindus were some person on the truthfulness of him they can trust.
Muslims said that there was none such person. The same question was asked from
the Hindus and they said that it was a very big occasion of test and was a
sensitive matter of religion. However, there is a Muslim
saint who never tell a
lie. Perhaps, he will also adhere to that which is the truth of this matter.
This saint was Mufti
Ilaahi Bakhsh Rahmatu-Allahe Ta-aala
Alaihe
(who was student of Hazrat
Shah Abdul Aziz Rahmatu-Allahe
Ta-aala Alaihe). The Magistrate sent his peon to
him requesting his to appear in the Courtroom. He replied to that peon that he
had pledged with himself to never see the face of the English. The Magistrate
sent him another message saying 'well! You do not see my face but please come
as the matter is very critical and decision cannot be made without your
presence'. * That
saint came and stood facing opposite to the face of the Magistrate. He was
briefed about the situation and was asked to tell what he knew about it.
Courtroom was stuffed with Hindus and Muslims and gazes of all were on his face
and all were silent to listen to his words. He untied his lips with words like
this: 'The
right is this that this place belongs to Hindus. Muslims have no relation with
it'. Court decided against Muslims and that place was given to Hindus. Muslims
had lost a national case but Islam had won a moral conquest. Display of
truthfulness and highest Islamic moral fiber had won the hearts of many
non-believers in loss of some square yards of land. The same day, many Hindus
embraced Islam on the hand of Mufti
Ilaahi Bakhsh Rahmatu-Allahe
Ta-aala Alaihe and
the drum of the highest moral fiber of Islam was beaten and heard in places
distant and far. Besides
the Conscience, Ilm
and Excellence and the Faith and Wisdom
was also considered
a precious and sacred stuff of possession selling which to any cost to the
hands of the Outsiders was considered a great sin. The previous Ulema-e-Aamil
of our nation valued it as a priceless gift of Allah
Almighty and a national
trust. Spending it especially for the indirect and direct support and help to
the Kufr, Shirk
and abomination and vices (Fisq O Fajoor) and using
it in capacity of a tout for system of a Kaafir
Ruler, was considered a big
national dishonesty and treason to Eimaan. Of similar good stature and sound
nature was a saint known as Maulana Abdul Raheem Raampuri (in 1634 Hijri). An
English Administrator of Roheel Khand, Mr. Hokinson, offered him 250 Rupees
monthly pay for teaching in Baraily College. This amount offered before the
year 1857, was almost equivalent to 1200 Rupees (in 1955). He was further
assured to get promoted further in terms of office and remuneration. Maulana
Abdul Raheem Raampuri used this excuse that he was being given 10 Rupees from
state which will be stopped. Hokinson said that he was, but, offering him ten
times more than this stipend from state. What is the value this small stipend
in comparison with such big amount of 250 Rupees. Irfan (Volume 2) IRFAAN 2 pdf download Install app |
|||||
First Prev 8 Next Last Buy This Printed Book
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
|
|||
|
|||